Samsung Galaxy A56 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
A comprehensive comparison of the two popular mid-range smartphones of 2025, analyzing their specifications, performance, and value proposition.
Comparison Contents
Phones Overview
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G is a mid-range smartphone that offers a premium build with glass and metal construction, versatile camera setup, and reliable performance through Samsung's Exynos processor.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro delivers exceptional value with its powerful MediaTek Dimensity processor, large battery capacity, ultra-fast charging, and high-resolution display at a competitive price point.
Design & Build
| 162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm (6.39 x 3.05 x 0.29 in) | 160.75 x 75.24 x 8.29 mm (6.33 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | |
| 198g (6.98 oz) | 195g (6.88 oz) | |
| Glass back, Metal frame | Plastic back, Plastic frame | |
| Black, Gray, Green, Pink | Black, Green, Yellow | |
| IP67 dust and water resistance | IP69 dust and water resistance | |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Vapor chamber cooling | |
| In-display fingerprint sensor | In-display fingerprint sensor |
Display
| 6.7-inch Super AMOLED | 6.67-inch AMOLED | |
| 1080 x 2340 pixels, 385 ppi | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 446 ppi | |
| 120Hz adaptive refresh rate | 120Hz adaptive refresh rate (60-120Hz) | |
| 1200 nits (1900 nits in HDR) | 1400 nits (3200 nits in HDR) | |
| HDR10+ | Dolby Vision, HDR support | |
| Gorilla Glass Victus Plus | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | |
| 87.6% screen-to-body ratio | 88.8% screen-to-body ratio | |
| Not specified | 480Hz touch sampling rate |
Performance
| Samsung Exynos 1580 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) | |
| Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | |
| Samsung Xclipse 540 | Mali-G720 MP7 | |
| 8GB, 12GB LPDDR5 | 8GB, 12GB LPDDR5X | |
| 128GB, 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB, 512GB UFS 4.0 | |
| Yes, NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | |
| 932,578 (AnTuTu v10) | 1,615,354 (AnTuTu v10) | |
| 1364 (Single), 3899 (Multi) | 1595 (Single), 6333 (Multi) |
Benchmark Comparison
AnTuTu v10 Benchmark Score
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Camera System
| 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0μm, PDAF, OIS | 50MP, f/1.5, 1/1.96", Sony IMX882, PDAF, OIS | |
| 12MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12μm | 8MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 1/4.0", 1.12μm | |
| 5MP Macro camera, f/2.4 | Not available | |
| 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps, Slow-mo 960fps | |
| 12MP, f/2.2, 4K@30fps | 20MP, f/2.2, 21mm, 1080p@60fps | |
| Bokeh mode, Pro mode | Bokeh mode, Pro mode | |
| LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Battery & Charging
| 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| 45W (65% in 30 min) | 90W (50% in 17 min) | |
| Full charge in 1:08 hr | Full charge in 0:42 hr | |
| No wireless charging | No wireless charging | |
| Not available | Reverse charging | |
| Not included | 90W charger included | |
| Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
Battery Comparison
Battery Capacity
Full Charging Time (minutes)
Charging Speed Comparison
OS & Software
| Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| One UI 7.0 | HyperOS 2.0 | |
| 4 years OS updates (expected) | 3 years OS updates (expected) | |
| 5 years security updates (expected) | 4 years security updates (expected) | |
| 21.5 GB OS size | Not specified | |
| Secure Folder, Private Share | Second Space, App Lock |
Audio & Multimedia
| Stereo speakers | Stereo speakers | |
| No 3.5mm headphone jack | No 3.5mm headphone jack | |
| Dolby Atmos | Dolby Atmos | |
| Not specified | 91.5 dB max loudness | |
| No FM Radio | No FM Radio |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 | |
| GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | |
| 5G support | 5G support | |
| NFC (all regions) | NFC (region dependent) | |
| No | Infrared port | |
| USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Dual SIM + eSIM | Dual SIM (no eSIM) |
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Premium build quality (glass back, metal frame)
- More versatile camera system with dedicated macro lens
- Longer software support (4 years OS, 5 years security)
- eSIM support for added connectivity options
- Gorilla Glass Victus Plus protection
- NFC available in all regions
- Thinner design (7.4mm vs 8.29mm)
Cons
- Significantly higher price ($499 vs $299)
- Lower performance in benchmarks
- Smaller battery (5000mAh vs 6000mAh)
- Slower charging (45W vs 90W)
- Lower resolution display
- No charger included in the box
- No infrared port for remote control functionality
Pros
- Exceptional value at $299 price point
- Superior performance (73% higher AnTuTu score)
- Larger 6000mAh battery
- Ultra-fast 90W charging with charger included
- Higher resolution display (1220 x 2712)
- Higher peak brightness (3200 nits in HDR)
- Infrared port for remote control functionality
- Better water/dust resistance (IP69)
Cons
- Plastic construction instead of glass/metal
- Less versatile camera system (no macro lens)
- Shorter software support lifecycle
- No eSIM support
- Region-dependent NFC availability
- Slightly thicker design (8.29mm vs 7.4mm)
- HyperOS may contain more bloatware than One UI
Conclusion
Which Phone Should You Buy?
Both the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro target different segments of the mid-range market with distinct priorities. Your choice should depend on what you value most in a smartphone.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G if you:
- Prefer premium build quality with glass and metal construction
- Want a more versatile camera system with macro capabilities
- Value longer software support and security updates
- Need eSIM functionality and consistent NFC availability
- Want a slimmer device with Samsung's refined One UI experience
- Don't mind paying a premium for the Samsung ecosystem
Choose the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro if you:
- Prioritize raw performance and gaming capabilities
- Need the longest possible battery life and fastest charging
- Want a higher resolution display with better brightness
- Are looking for the best value for your money
- Use the infrared port for controlling home devices
- Want a fast, feature-rich experience at a lower price point
Both devices represent different approaches to the mid-range market in 2025. The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G follows a more balanced approach with focus on build quality, software experience, and camera versatility at a higher price point. The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro prioritizes raw performance, battery life, and display quality while offering incredible value. Your personal priorities will determine which is the better choice for your specific needs.
Feature Ratings
Final Scores
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G excels with its premium build quality, versatile camera setup, and reliable Samsung software experience. It offers a well-rounded package for users who prioritize consistent performance and long-term software support in the mid-range segment.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro stands out with its exceptional performance, impressive battery life, and high-resolution display, all at an extremely competitive price point. It represents outstanding value for users who prioritize raw power and advanced features in the mid-range segment.
Overall Winner
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro emerges as the overall winner in this comparison due to its exceptional value proposition. While the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G offers a more premium build and better long-term software support, the Poco X7 Pro's significantly stronger performance, larger battery, faster charging, and superior display quality make it the better choice for most users, especially considering its much lower price point.
The performance gap is particularly significant, with the Poco X7 Pro scoring 73% higher in AnTuTu benchmarks. Combined with a higher resolution display, better battery life, and faster charging, it simply offers more of what most users want from a smartphone in 2025. Unless you specifically value Samsung's ecosystem, software longevity, or premium build materials, the Poco X7 Pro offers substantially better value for money.